#Stupid game moments software

This reasoning would also apply to games made with the same engine which share source code-this would not constitute copying because the games' similarity is inherent to the tools. This particular feature (regardless of how central it may be to a game) is essentially the same in all games created with that engine, which takes it outside the scope of copyright. However, because of limitations or certain peculiarities of an engine, some designs or passive-background tasks may occur in a particular way for every game made using that engine. Companies create these engines for the purpose of allowing developers (with or without charge) to create games.

#Stupid game moments software

They consist of a software suite with a multitude of components, such as a rendering engine, audio engine, physics engine, and artificial intelligence. Assets will often have to be recreated in order to create a new game (or sequel by another company or creator), which is a common complaint of game developers, as it usually costs large amounts of money to create commercially viable assets and makes it difficult for smaller developers to produce games.Ī game engine is a framework which a developer can use to create games. This limits the public pool of resources/assets. This is not an issue with large video game publishers (such as EA, Activision, or Sony), but when these self-contained companies create large and detailed worlds, most of the assets they create end up being used only once. The model of granting access and permission to use these assets differs across websites and may range from an upfront payment to a portion of profits (if the assets are used commercially). There is a plethora of websites which allow creators to 'borrow' assets to implement in-game. There are multiple aspects about video game creation that have led to different components of the software being copyrighted separately some cannot be copyrighted at all because of their existence in the public domain or Creative Commons. Issues related to intellectual property protection in video games Game creation

2.2.1.5 Abstraction-filtration-comparison test.

1.1.4 Music creators, voice actors and other contributors.

1 Issues related to intellectual property protection in video games.

Setting Missile Weapons to Autofire when your primary armament(s) use Missiles. Getting a Stasis Pod, and forgetting it exists in your inventory even though you are given the opportunity to attempt to follow though on the quest. Having 1-3 HP left and deciding that getting into a fight is an excellent idea, only to find a ship that can reliably hit you. Risking your ship being blown apart because you were focusing too hard on the boarders attacking your crew and forgetting that your weapons are charged and you have to shoot the enemy ship too. Getting into a large melee with Zoltan and forgetting that they now explode on death. Realizing you have a system/weapon/drone that could've made that last fight easier/possible, after the fight is already finished.

Extra painful with the Federation Crusier. Forgetting to pull back your boarding party as you blast a ship to pieces. Being caught in an ion storm that disabled oxygen, and not turning it back on as you continued into the nebula. I haven't had a lot of notably stupid moments for a while in FTL, especially since AE released, so I'll just list off a lot of common fatal mistakes: I bet you feel REALLY stupid now knowing that this is a feature since AE.

Automatically pauses whenever you tab out of FTL. Go to the options menu, select the 'Windows Focus Auto-Pause' feature or something like that.

And keep in mind that the O² system does NOT auto-repower when being repaired (unlike shields). Note to self: Don't tab out unless the oxygen is green. Alblaka wrote:Needless to say, this thread got my interest caught well enough for me to tab back in onto the 'Your crew has died' screen.